1
Naive RAG
Simple implementation with reasonable accuracy for straightforward use cases
Exploring 7 architectures that transform how AI systems access and utilize knowledge
A revolutionary approach that grounds LLM responses in verified, up-to-date information from trusted sources.
While Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4 demonstrate remarkable capabilities, they still face significant limitations:
RAG addresses these limitations by:
Transform documents into vector representations and store them in a vector database
Convert user query to a vector and find semantically similar content
Enhance the prompt with retrieved context information
Produce a response grounded in the retrieved context
But not all RAG systems are created equal. Let's explore the spectrum of architectures...
From basic to cutting-edge, explore the evolution of RAG architectures and their unique capabilities.
The Foundation of Knowledge Retrieval
At its core, Naive RAG implements three straightforward steps: retrieve relevant documents based on a query, augment a prompt with this context, and generate a response grounded in that information.
Convert this query into a vector
Retrieve the most relevant sections from technical documentation
Augment a prompt with these documentation excerpts
Generate a response explaining the specific troubleshooting steps applicable to this error code
from langchain.vectorstores import FAISS
from langchain.embeddings import OpenAIEmbeddings
from langchain.chains import RetrievalQA
from langchain.chat_models import ChatOpenAI
from langchain.document_loaders import TextLoader
# Load and split documents
loader = TextLoader("documentation.txt")
documents = loader.load()
# Create vector store
embedding_model = OpenAIEmbeddings()
vectorstore = FAISS.from_documents(documents, embedding_model)
# Initialize retriever and LLM
retriever = vectorstore.as_retriever()
llm = ChatOpenAI(model_name="gpt-3.5-turbo")
# Setup RAG pipeline
rag_chain = RetrievalQA.from_chain_type(llm=llm, retriever=retriever)
# Ask a question
response = rag_chain.run("What are troubleshooting steps for error E-5501?")
print(response)
Precision in Information Retrieval
Retrieve-and-Rerank RAG enhances the basic approach with an intelligent reranking step, significantly improving the quality of retrieved information.
This architecture uses two distinct measures of relevance: vector similarity for initial retrieval, followed by more sophisticated semantic relevance scoring.
Initially retrieve multiple documents mentioning smart home automation, competitors, energy management, and market positioning
Rerank these documents based on how directly they address the relationship between emerging competitors and their energy management capabilities
Select only the most relevant analysis documents that specifically discuss this relationship
Generate a response synthesizing insights from these carefully selected sources
from langchain.vectorstores import FAISS
from langchain.embeddings import HuggingFaceEmbeddings
from langchain.chains import RetrievalQA
from langchain.chat_models import ChatOpenAI
from langchain.retrievers import ContextualCompressionRetriever
from langchain.retrievers.document_compressors import CohereRerank
# Create vector DB from docs
vectorstore = FAISS.from_documents(docs, HuggingFaceEmbeddings())
# Use a reranker as document compressor
reranker = CohereRerank(model="rerank-english-v2.0", top_n=4)
# Wrap retriever with reranker
retriever = ContextualCompressionRetriever(
base_compressor=reranker,
base_retriever=vectorstore.as_retriever(search_kwargs={"k": 25})
)
# Setup RetrievalQA pipeline
qa_chain = RetrievalQA.from_chain_type(
llm=ChatOpenAI(), retriever=retriever
)
response = qa_chain.run("What are key features of emerging competitors?")
print(response)
Integrating Diverse Data Types
Multimodal RAG expands beyond text to incorporate multiple data formats—including images, tables, charts, and potentially audio/video—into a unified retrieval system.
Process text data from quality control reports and machine logs
Analyze scanned inspection forms and photographs of the parts (as images)
Interpret measurement data charts and tolerance specification tables
Retrieve and integrate relevant multimodal information about similar quality incidents
Generate a comprehensive analysis that references specific visual elements from the documentation
Text Documents
Images
Tables
Charts
Video
Audio
Multimodal Embedding Model
Converts all data types into a shared vector space
Unified Retrieval System
Finds relevant content across all modalities
Mapping Relationships and Dependencies
Graph RAG enhances retrieval by incorporating knowledge graphs that explicitly model entities and relationships, enabling more sophisticated reasoning about interconnected concepts.
Identify key entities: Malaysian supplier, semiconductors, production timeline, European distribution centers, alternative suppliers
Traverse the knowledge graph to find connections between these entities
Discover hierarchical relationships (which products use the affected components), geographical relationships (supplier locations relative to distribution centers), and dependency chains
Retrieve relevant documents about each entity and their relationships
Generate a comprehensive answer that articulates the structured impact picture
Combining Dense and Sparse Retrieval
Hybrid RAG combines the strengths of multiple retrieval techniques—typically dense (semantic) and sparse (keyword-based) retrieval—to achieve both precision and recall in finding relevant information.
Use keyword-based retrieval to find documents containing exact error code "ERR-429"
Use semantic retrieval to find contextually relevant documents about password reset issues regardless of error code terminology
Combine both result sets, ensuring both exact matches for the error code and conceptually relevant password reset troubleshooting information
Rerank the combined results based on relevance to the specific issue
Generate a comprehensive response that explains that ERR-429 indicates rate limiting from too many attempts, while also providing mobile app-specific password reset guidance
(Dense Vectors)
(Sparse Vectors)
Combining and prioritizing results from both approaches
Creating comprehensive answers with technical precision and conceptual understanding
from langchain.retrievers import BM25Retriever, EnsembleRetriever
from langchain.vectorstores import FAISS
from langchain.embeddings import OpenAIEmbeddings
from langchain.chains import RetrievalQA
from langchain.llms import OpenAI
# Create a vector store for semantic search
documents = document_loader.load()
vectorstore = FAISS.from_documents(documents, OpenAIEmbeddings())
dense_retriever = vectorstore.as_retriever(search_kwargs={"k": 4})
# Create a BM25 retriever for keyword search
bm25_retriever = BM25Retriever.from_documents(documents)
bm25_retriever.k = 4
# Create an ensemble retriever
ensemble_retriever = EnsembleRetriever(
retrievers=[dense_retriever, bm25_retriever],
weights=[0.5, 0.5]
)
# Create a QA chain
qa_chain = RetrievalQA.from_chain_type(
llm=OpenAI(),
retriever=ensemble_retriever
)
# Query the system
response = qa_chain.run("What causes ERR-429 error during password reset?")
print(response)
Intelligent Query Routing
Agentic Router RAG introduces AI-driven decision-making to the retrieval process. Instead of using a fixed retrieval strategy for all queries, this architecture employs an "agent" to analyze each query and dynamically determine the most appropriate retrieval approach.
The router agent analyzes the query and identifies two distinct information needs: contraindications related to penicillin allergy and alternative treatments for pneumonia
For the contraindications, it routes to a medical knowledge base with specific medication information
For treatment alternatives, it routes to clinical guidelines specifically about pneumonia management
The agent combines information from both sources, ensuring all relevant contraindications are covered and that only appropriate treatment alternatives based on the specific condition are provided
A comprehensive response is generated that addresses both aspects of the query with clinically accurate information
from langchain.chains import LLMChain
from langchain.prompts import PromptTemplate
from langchain.chat_models import ChatOpenAI
from langchain.retrievers import WikipediaRetriever, ArxivRetriever
from langchain.tools import Tool
from langchain.agents import initialize_agent, AgentType
# Define various retrievers
wikipedia_retriever = WikipediaRetriever()
arxiv_retriever = ArxivRetriever()
# Define LLM for the router
llm = ChatOpenAI(temperature=0)
# Create tools for different data sources
tools = [
Tool(
name="Wikipedia",
func=wikipedia_retriever.get_relevant_documents,
description="Useful for general knowledge questions"
),
Tool(
name="ArXiv",
func=arxiv_retriever.get_relevant_documents,
description="Useful for scientific research questions"
)
]
# Initialize the agent (router)
router = initialize_agent(
tools,
llm,
agent=AgentType.ZERO_SHOT_REACT_DESCRIPTION,
verbose=True
)
# Function that routes queries to appropriate data sources
def route_query(query):
result = router.run(
f"Based on this query, retrieve relevant information: {query}"
)
return result
# Example usage
answer = route_query("What are the latest advancements in quantum computing?")
print(answer)
Collaborative AI for Complex Queries
The most advanced RAG architecture employs a team of specialized AI agents that collaborate to address complex, multi-faceted queries. Each agent has specific roles and expertise, working together in an orchestrated workflow to develop comprehensive solutions.
The query is decomposed into multiple research areas: regulatory analysis, market research, competitive intelligence, internal capabilities assessment, and strategy formulation
Regulatory Agent researches European Union renewable energy policies, country-specific incentives, and compliance requirements
Market Analyst Agent examines market size, growth projections, regional variations, and consumer trends
Competitive Intelligence Agent identifies key players, their strategies, market shares, and potential competitive advantages
Internal Analysis Agent evaluates the company's relevant capabilities, resources, and potential synergies
Strategy Agent synthesizes all insights to provide a comprehensive recommendation with potential entry strategies and risk assessments
Complex, multi-faceted question
Decomposes task, assigns roles, manages workflow
Information gathering, fact-finding
Evaluation, interpretation, insight generation
Specialized knowledge application
Fact-checking, testing, feedback
Integration, coherence, summarization
Alternative solutions, innovation
Combining insights, reconciling differences
Cohesive, thorough answer integrating multiple perspectives
from langchain.agents import Tool, AgentExecutor, LLMSingleActionAgent
from langchain.chains import LLMChain
from langchain.llms import OpenAI
from langchain.prompts import StringPromptTemplate
from langchain.tools import BaseTool
from typing import List, Union, Optional
# Define specialized agents with their own tools and retrievers
class ResearchAgent:
def __init__(self, llm):
self.llm = llm
# Configure with research-specific tools...
def find_information(self, query: str) -> str:
# Implement research logic
return "Research findings on the topic..."
class AnalysisAgent:
def __init__(self, llm):
self.llm = llm
# Configure with analysis-specific tools...
def analyze_information(self, information: str) -> str:
# Implement analysis logic
return "Analysis of the provided information..."
class DomainExpertAgent:
def __init__(self, llm, domain: str):
self.llm = llm
self.domain = domain
# Configure with domain-specific knowledge base...
def provide_expertise(self, question: str) -> str:
# Apply domain expertise
return f"Expert guidance on {self.domain}..."
class OrchestratorAgent:
def __init__(self, llm, agents: List):
self.llm = llm
self.agents = agents
def process_query(self, query: str) -> str:
# Step 1: Decompose the query into subtasks
subtasks = self._decompose_query(query)
# Step 2: Assign subtasks to appropriate agents
results = []
for subtask in subtasks:
agent = self._select_agent(subtask)
result = agent.process(subtask)
results.append(result)
# Step 3: Integrate the results
final_response = self._integrate_results(results, query)
return final_response
def _decompose_query(self, query: str) -> List[str]:
# Logic to break query into subtasks
return ["Research subtask", "Analysis subtask", "Expert input needed"]
def _select_agent(self, subtask: str):
# Logic to match subtask to appropriate agent
for agent in self.agents:
if agent.can_handle(subtask):
return agent
def _integrate_results(self, results: List[str], original_query: str) -> str:
# Logic to synthesize a cohesive response
return "Comprehensive answer combining all agent insights..."
# Example setup and usage
llm = OpenAI(temperature=0)
research_agent = ResearchAgent(llm)
analysis_agent = AnalysisAgent(llm)
market_expert = DomainExpertAgent(llm, "renewable energy market")
regulatory_expert = DomainExpertAgent(llm, "EU regulations")
agents = [research_agent, analysis_agent, market_expert, regulatory_expert]
orchestrator = OrchestratorAgent(llm, agents)
response = orchestrator.process_query(
"Should our company invest in the European renewable energy market?"
)
print(response)
Find the right approach for your specific use case and organizational needs
Simple implementation with reasonable accuracy for straightforward use cases
Enhanced accuracy with moderate implementation complexity
| Architecture |
Implementation Complexity |
Retrieval Accuracy |
Response Time |
Cost Efficiency |
Data Type Flexibility |
Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naive RAG | Low | Medium | Fast | High | Limited | Straightforward Q&A with well-defined data |
| Retrieve-and-Rerank | Medium | High | Medium | Medium | Limited | Precision-focused applications with complex queries |
| Multimodal RAG | High | High | Slow | Low | Excellent | Content with mixed media: documents, images, charts |
| Graph RAG | High | High | Medium | Medium | Medium | Relationship-focused queries requiring multi-hop reasoning |
| Hybrid RAG | Medium | Very High | Medium | Medium | Medium | Applications requiring both semantic understanding and exact matching |
| Agentic (Router) RAG | High | Very High | Slow | Low | Excellent | Diverse content with varying query types requiring adaptive strategies |
| Agentic (Multi-Agent) RAG | Very High | Excellent | Very Slow | Very Low | Excellent | Complex analysis requiring multiple perspectives and specialized knowledge |
Key factors to consider when implementing a RAG system
The way you split your documents significantly impacts retrieval performance. Consider semantic chunking over arbitrary splits, and experiment with different chunk sizes based on your content type.
Choose embedding models that match your content domain. Domain-specific embeddings often outperform general-purpose ones. Consider dimensions, performance, and cost tradeoffs.
More complex RAG architectures introduce additional processing time. Evaluate whether your use case prioritizes speed or accuracy, and consider hybrid approaches or caching for common queries.
Consider where your data lives during embedding and retrieval. Some use cases require fully on-premises solutions, while others can leverage cloud services with appropriate safeguards.
Define clear metrics for success. Beyond accuracy, consider coverage, reasoning quality, and hallucination rates. Implement both automated and human-in-the-loop evaluation methods.
Implement strategies for keeping your knowledge base current. Consider incremental updates, change detection, and automated reindexing to maintain accuracy over time.
Implement safeguards like source attribution, confidence scoring, and answer validation. Consider generating explicit citations and providing links to original sources.
Well-designed prompts are crucial for RAG effectiveness. Experiment with different prompt structures, including clear instructions for context utilization, factuality guidelines, and response format specifications.
Design your system to scale with growing content volumes. Consider distributed vector databases, efficient indexing strategies, and optimized retrieval algorithms to maintain performance at scale.
Establish specific use cases and success metrics for your RAG system
Inventory available content, assess quality, and plan preprocessing needs
Choose the appropriate approach based on your use case needs and resource constraints
Create evaluation datasets and methodologies before deployment
Start with simpler architectures, measure outcomes, then enhance as needed
Continuously track performance metrics and user feedback to improve the system
Emerging trends and innovations that will shape the next generation of retrieval-augmented systems
Systems that continually learn from interaction patterns, automatically refining retrieval strategies based on user feedback and success metrics.
Movement beyond static knowledge bases toward systems that can ingest, process, and utilize fresh information in near real-time from continuous data streams.
Optimized implementations that can run efficiently on edge devices, enabling powerful retrieval capabilities without constant cloud connectivity.
Future RAG systems will dynamically adjust their architecture based on query complexity, choosing the most efficient and effective approach for each specific task.
Organizations will build interconnected RAG ecosystems where knowledge flows seamlessly across domains, with proper governance and verifiability baked in.
RAG will evolve into systems that don't just retrieve and present information, but collaborate with humans to create, refine, and expand shared knowledge pools.
An educational resource exploring the evolution and application of Retrieval Augmented Generation architectures.
© 2025 RAG Spectrum. All rights reserved.